To borrow the deathless phraseology of Professor AbuKhalil: for those who care and do not care, my interview with Scott Horton at Antiwar Radio can be heard here.

As usual, Scott led the conversation in several interesting directions, to which I made the usual rambling, semi-coherent contributions.  But one thing I did try to put forth was the idea of a "united front" across the political spectrum, dedicated to a single, overarching goal: dismantling the empire. Much evil would cease, and many good things would flow from such a development.

I worked up some notes on the matter before the talk, and added some more thoughts afterward; these are appended below. Much of this is an expansion and refinement of some ideas mentioned in a recent post, so I hope you'll forgive any repetition. But that original piece dealt with other topics as well, and I thought this idea merited a spotlight of its own. So here it is.

Dissidents and critics of the powers that be are often accused of being negative – tearing things down, undermining, never offering a positive alternative vision. Now, I happen to disagree with this. I believe that people who work in waste management – clearing away the garbage, the poisons, the crap – are just as important to the life and health of a community as, say, an architect who makes the community beautiful, or a teacher who educates the young, or doctors who heal the sick and so on.

But – it so happens that I do have a positive program to offer, a viable, workable, practical approach to many of our problems. This is what my program offers:

Lower  taxes
Stronger national security
More jobs
Greater prosperity
Higher wages
Better schools, roads, and health care
Less government
Safer streets

What's more, this program requires no social upheaval, no political turmoil, no violence – no revolution from either Left or Right. It can be accomplished entirely within the existing political and economic system. It needs no new government powers, no new bureaucracies, no new taxes.

All it requires is simply this: Bring America Home. End our worldwide military empire.

As I noted the other day, ending America's imperial wars and dismantling America's global military empire – and its global gulag -- would save trillions of dollars in the coming years. Not only from cuts in direct military spending, but also from the vastly reduced need for "Homeland security" funding in a world where the United States was no longer invading foreign lands, killing their people, supporting their tyrants -- and inciting revenge and resistance.

This would release a flood of money for any number of new domestic initiatives, while also giving scope for deep tax cuts across the board. Working people would thrive, the poor, the sick and the vulnerable would be better off, businesses would grow, opportunity would expand, the care and education of our children would be greatly enhanced, our infrastructure could be repaired and strengthened, our environment better cleansed and cared for. The end of empire would also mean an end to the horrendous economic distortion wrought by our war-profiteering industries. Other businesses would inevitably come to the fore, economic activity would be spread more evenly across more sectors.

In short, people could keep more of their own money while government spending could be directed toward improving the quality of life of all the nation's citizens.

Now, this is not some pie-in-the-sky dream. We all have our own ideas and beliefs about what consitutes the good life, or the best kind of society. And in a post-empire America, there would be plenty of scope for heated debate on all kinds of issues; ideological conflicts, 'culture wars,' partisan wrangling, would go on. And of course there would still be injustice, corruption, and much suffering in society. So we're not talking about a utopia.

But – it would be a better society than it is now. It would be more humane, more just, more secure, more peaceful, more sustainable, more prosperous than it is now. And all our culture wars and political conflicts would take place in a healthier context, in a freer land, where the focus is on "the pursuit of happiness," not the "projection of dominance" around the world.

This alternative is entirely achievable, by ordinary human beings. It requires no miracles, no god-like heroes or messianic leaders to bring it about. We could easily dismantle the empire – carefully, safely, with proper planning and deliberation – over the next 10 years.

So that's my blueprint for a better future: Bring America Home. It's not revolution, it's not rocket science, it's not dogmatic or doctrinaire. You could support this and still be a Democrat or a Republican, a Baptist or a Marxist, a Muslim or a Jew, a Libertarian or a Green, an environmentalist or an industrialist, a physicist or an alchemist, a soldier or a pacificist – because it's not about trying to build the perfect society, it's not about promulgating, promoting -- or imposing -- a wide-ranging agenda or particular set of policies. It's about taking a single, simple step that will automatically make life better than it is today – for Americans, and for the rest of the world.

Of course, as I noted to Scott, although this vision is itself very reasonable, practicable, doable -- heck, downright serious, moderate and bipartisan, even, as we are told we must be in order to "get things done" -- what is perhaps utopian is the idea that our political and media elites would allow this message to be heard. As I put it in that earlier piece (with a few additions here):

But [a post-imperial] society is precisely what our elites cannot -- or, to be more accurate, will not -- imagine. Because, yes, it would "erode" their "influence" around the world -- to some extent, at least. Although they would still be comfortable, coddled and privileged far beyond the dreams of ordinary people, they could no longer merge their individual psyches with the larger entity of a globe-spanning, death-dealing empire -- a connection which, although itself a projection of their own brains, gives them a forever-inflated sense of worth and importance.

So they will fight tooth and nail, with every weapon they have -- and they've got 'em all -- to resist any message that threatens their "cabin'd, cribb'd, confined" minds. They will, as they have always done, trivialize, marginalize, mock, dismiss and demonize anyone who even questions the wisdom of maintaining a global empire of up to 1,000 military installations in more than 100 countries -- and the bloated, belligerent war machine required to support and expand this global military dominance.

They will also, as they have always done, use the ancient imperial tactic of "divide and conquer," setting the opponents of empire against each other: "Ooh, you're a liberal, how can you cozy up to a reactionary like Ron Paul?" "Oh come on, you're a conservative; you want to jump in bed with a commie America-hater like Noam Chomsky?" And so on and so forth.

But that is one thing in favor of a single-minded approach. No one has to "marry" anyone else politically; no one has to embrace every tenet or belief that an anti-imperialist ally might hold. You simply have to say: "All of us, regardless of our other views, believe this truth to be self-evident: dismantling the empire will bring immediate and enormous benefits to our nation and to the world."

And the plain fact is that America's military empire is unsustainable. It is going to be diminished, degraded and finally lost, one way or another, at some point or another. The only question is whether Americans want to control that process themselves -- to dismantle their empire carefully, responsibly, and beneficially, on their own terms, in a way that would renew the nation's prosperity and opportunity -- or if they want to see it collapse around their ears, in blood and ruin, blighting their lives and the lives of their children for generations.

And speaking in strictly political terms, a one-plank program that guaranteed lower taxes, more jobs, more security and all the other benefits enumerated above sounds to me like a winning hand. It's certainly one worth laying on the table

| More...

Comments (10)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Jason said:

	... Thanks Chris. I throughly enjoyed the Scott Horton interview. Speaking for myself, I look forward to your repetitious critiques of imperial America and how it could be so, so much better for everyone. We can live in the eyes of love, instead of the eyes of fear.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 25, 2010
Votes: +3

Paul said:

... Thanks Chris. Great work as always. Speaking from my own experience here in the Netherlands, I gather that there are too many people still figuring that personally the system, however bad it may be more and more people, still serves their interests well enough. I assume something like that applies to the vast majority of the educated classes throughout the Western world. They still have their jobs, their holidays, their stylish diversions... This is not meant to in any way criticise your courageous and superbly sane idea as laid out above. You are completely right about the need to come together and demand the dismantling of the 'empire of bases' and the wars it wages. Yes it surely must be do-able, but even, as you yourself have also said repeatedly, just making that demand is the only way to keep your own humanity intact. Keep up the great work!

report abuse vote down vote up

February 25, 2010
Votes: +3

Michael Hureaux Perez said:

... Yeah, makes sense to me. I decided to formally join an organization with a point by point program myself, just because I couldn't come up with anything better on my own and I trust the folks who drew it up. Even if all it is is an existential choice in the long run, it gives you something to put in the hands of people who say, "Okay, bright guy, so what would you do? Do you have a plan?". Well, no, there are enough plans. But here are somethings we should do for starters, na?

report abuse vote down vote up

February 25, 2010
Votes: +0

john kelley said:

	... Amen! But, watch out,...as Joe Bageant points out in a February 24th piece at Counterpunch: "The autonomous economy now has a tongue."
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 25, 2010
Votes: +1

mistah charley, ph.d. said:

... I agree that it might be possible to find common ground in the resolve to "Bring America Home" - but you don't just mean supporting our troops by bringing them home safely [in other words, "turning tail and running", as some would call it.] It is also a call for the prodigal son to recognize the error of his wandering ways and to return, humbly, to his father's house - metaphorically speaking, of course. More prosaically, we would have to recognize the wisdom of George Washington, and Dwight Eisenhower, with regard to foreign entanglements and the economic power of the Masters of War - the military industrial congressional financial corporate media complex, aka MICFiC. This call for renewal implies a diminishing of the MICFiC's power - and so of course they will fight "Bring America Home" tooth and nail, if it ever gets big enough to where just ignoring it is no longer possible. However, it also implies a rethinking of the U.S.'s place in the world, and of the harm we have done while we were in the MICFiC's thrall. In other words, we as a nation would have to accept that we have sinned, and need to repent. This is a big change in worldview, and I wonder if there is a way it can happen in the foreseeable future (however long that is.) As the Dutch said in their long struggle against Spanish rule, however: it is not necessary to hope - it is only necessary to persevere.

report abuse vote down vote up

February 25, 2010
Votes: +7

scott douglas said:

	... Chris, Thanks for the new song, and the great interview with Scott Horton. Thanks for the bringing the message. Scott
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 25, 2010
Votes: +1

Expat said:

	But first ... Somehow the country will have to get out of the monkey trap. The one where the monkey grasps a desired good in a gourd, and will not let it out of its grasp, trapped by their great desire, otherwise free. It will not end well.
	report abuse vote down vote up

February 27, 2010
Votes: +0

Gabe Gabriel said:

... When a great wordsmith comes around it is inspiration to observe. Dylan is one of those. The broken voice is like one crying out from the grave in its last effort to force memories of an earlier time when the young spoke loud in the streets, and change actually seemed possible, and actually happened to the words of Dylan in music. The 60s Poet seemingly dying inside as his words struggle and search for the energy of his youth to hang upon just one more time, might someone listen one more time? Might change be energized one more time? To watch Dylans performance in these current times is the mirror image of a self portrait of ourselves as we see what could have been, to what we have become.

report abuse vote down vote up

March 03, 2010
Votes: +0

Gabe Gabriel said:

	... I clicked on to comment about the Dylan article. it was put here somehow?
	report abuse vote down vote up

March 03, 2010
Votes: +0

chasm said:

	the lord of the flies Fancy thinking the beast was something you could hunt and kill.
	report abuse vote down vote up

March 14, 2010
Votes: +0